@cfm_sol

Loading…. .

There are two parts to the reason behind $e/acc rise this time. The first part is looking at e/acc itself, while the second part is looking at $PAID. I’ll put the tweet link for the second part in the comments CbcyNo7m1amFWqEQm2m4PLv1UNvpcL3C1Ujm6AkzpKoU The direct catalyst fo

@cfm_solJeff · X / Twitter

QuoteSep 26, 05:56 AM

$e/acc rise itself is not the biggest benefit for $PAID. It is more like a very successful Product Demo, showing that UsePaid’s Fee Flow is beginning to be validated by multiple projects. 98kfF7rmsg1QDUEoCqNE7g7M1FdrTt92TEp2CLzypump My analysis is as follows:One of the most direct catalysts for PAID this time is e/acc: e/acc Trading → Creator Fees → UsePaid → 80% X Money → Beff 20% → Buy PAID → Burn The e/acc case proves that a Token’s trading fees can be converted into real-world X Money Funding through UsePaid, while part of the funds flows back into PAID. But more importantly, we can no longer look at e/acc alone. Paid officially published its Top Paid Launches: parafactual: $2.33M MC → $30,513 sent to parafactual CALI: $2.22M MC → $49,965 sent to mayemusk ELON: $681K MC → $10,759 sent to elonmusk SOLCAT: $164K MC → $70,690 sent to solana BOAR: $91K MC → $39,588 sent to nikitabier The five projects have generated approximately $201K in actual payments in total. The most important point is not the market caps of these Tokens, but that Paid Launches have started to evolve from a single case into multiple real cases. So I believe the fundamental narrative has already started to ch…