9wcpJweVnKaGWhBd9xYT4ZXrjsyed53iipNiPQi6pump
- First call
- $25.3K
- Current
- $13.8K
- ATH after call
- 7.96× +695.6%
1 call · 1 post

I deploy runners on @pumpfun
Ranked by market cap growth after the call.
9wcpJweVnKaGWhBd9xYT4ZXrjsyed53iipNiPQi6pump
1 call · 1 post
Posts published by this account, newest first. Filter the history to posts that contain an attributed call.
14/ If you genuinely believe a coin has potential, help it. If you have a better idea, contribute it. If you think the narrative needs more attention, create attention. If you think the community needs something, build it. That's how you actually find out what a coin is capable of.
15/ Because nobody can tell you a coin's full potential if nobody ever gives it a real chance. You can't complain that something “never sent” while doing absolutely nothing to help create the conditions for it to send. That's not how community-driven coins work.
16/ And that's really my biggest issue with Crypto Twitter right now. Too many spectators. Not enough contributors. Everyone wants to call the outcome before they're willing to participate in the process. Everyone wants to say “I told you so.” Almost nobody wants to say: “How can I help?”
13/ The irony is that the people screaming “rug” the loudest are often the same people who contributed absolutely nothing while the coin was trying to build momentum. No posts. No memes. No engagement. No community building. Nothing. Then the chart turns red and suddenly they're experts.
14/ If you genuinely believe a coin has potential, help it. If you have a better idea, contribute it. If you think the narrative needs more attention, create attention. If you think the community needs something, build it. That's how you actually find out what a coin is capable of.
12/ I think we've created a culture where people are obsessed with finding someone to blame. Instead of asking: “Why didn't this work?” We immediately ask: “Who rugged?” “Who farmed?” “Who dumped?” “Who can I blame?” And sometimes there isn't a villain. Sometimes it just didn't work.
13/ The irony is that the people screaming “rug” the loudest are often the same people who contributed absolutely nothing while the coin was trying to build momentum. No posts. No memes. No engagement. No community building. Nothing. Then the chart turns red and suddenly they're experts.
11/ And the same goes for KOLs. Someone posting a CA and giving their opinion doesn't automatically mean they're farming you. Someone taking a CTO doesn't automatically mean they're promising a 100x. Someone trying to bring life to a narrative doesn't mean they're responsible for whether the entire market decides to buy it.
12/ I think we've created a culture where people are obsessed with finding someone to blame. Instead of asking: “Why didn't this work?” We immediately ask: “Who rugged?” “Who farmed?” “Who dumped?” “Who can I blame?” And sometimes there isn't a villain. Sometimes it just didn't work.
10/ But there's a massive difference between saying you don't believe in something… and automatically accusing everyone involved of being a scammer or farmer because the coin didn't perform. A failed coin is not automatically a rug. Sometimes the narrative just didn't catch. Sometimes the market moved on. Sometimes the attention wasn't enough. Sometimes it simply didn't work.
11/ And the same goes for KOLs. Someone posting a CA and giving their opinion doesn't automatically mean they're farming you. Someone taking a CTO doesn't automatically mean they're promising a 100x. Someone trying to bring life to a narrative doesn't mean they're responsible for whether the entire market decides to buy it.
9/ And I'm NOT saying everyone has to support every coin. You don't owe a project anything. You don't have to buy it. You don't have to shill it. You don't have to believe in the narrative. You can look at a coin and say: “I don't think this is going anywhere.” That's completely fair.
10/ But there's a massive difference between saying you don't believe in something… and automatically accusing everyone involved of being a scammer or farmer because the coin didn't perform. A failed coin is not automatically a rug. Sometimes the narrative just didn't catch. Sometimes the market moved on. Sometimes the attention wasn't enough. Sometimes it simply didn't work.
8/ Where were all of you before it fell? That's the part I don't understand. People will sit completely silent while a coin is struggling… then become extremely vocal the second it starts going down. It's almost like people would rather be right about something failing than actually help it succeed.
9/ And I'm NOT saying everyone has to support every coin. You don't owe a project anything. You don't have to buy it. You don't have to shill it. You don't have to believe in the narrative. You can look at a coin and say: “I don't think this is going anywhere.” That's completely fair.
7/ Because I've seen this happen so many times. A coin is sitting there. Nobody is posting about it. Nobody is creating content. Nobody is pushing the narrative. Nobody is trying to give it attention. Then the coin falls… and suddenly the replies are FULL. “RUG.” “SCAM.” “FARM.”
8/ Where were all of you before it fell? That's the part I don't understand. People will sit completely silent while a coin is struggling… then become extremely vocal the second it starts going down. It's almost like people would rather be right about something failing than actually help it succeed.
6/ But ask yourself something: What did YOU do to help the coin? Did you make content? Did you create memes? Did you bring attention to it? Did you introduce anyone to the community? Did you help push the narrative? Did you contribute anything at all?
7/ Because I've seen this happen so many times. A coin is sitting there. Nobody is posting about it. Nobody is creating content. Nobody is pushing the narrative. Nobody is trying to give it attention. Then the coin falls… and suddenly the replies are FULL. “RUG.” “SCAM.” “FARM.”
5/ But here's where I think Crypto Twitter gets backwards. A KOL can spend hours pushing a narrative, creating content, bringing attention and trying to build momentum… and if the coin doesn't send? Suddenly they're a farmer. “Bro just farmed you.” “Another rug.” “KOL dumped.” “Never trust these guys.”
6/ But ask yourself something: What did YOU do to help the coin? Did you make content? Did you create memes? Did you bring attention to it? Did you introduce anyone to the community? Did you help push the narrative? Did you contribute anything at all?
4/ There are people who trade completely silently. In. Out. Next coin. No posts. No community. No opinions. And that's completely fine. Then there are people who see something they believe has potential and actually want to see what it can become. They step up. They talk about it. They create attention. They try to build.
5/ But here's where I think Crypto Twitter gets backwards. A KOL can spend hours pushing a narrative, creating content, bringing attention and trying to build momentum… and if the coin doesn't send? Suddenly they're a farmer. “Bro just farmed you.” “Another rug.” “KOL dumped.” “Never trust these guys.”
3/ Some KOLs will take over multiple coins. Some will jump from narrative to narrative. Some will trade in and out. Some will stay with one coin and try to build it as far as they possibly can. That's just different styles of trading. Not everyone in crypto operates the same way.
4/ There are people who trade completely silently. In. Out. Next coin. No posts. No community. No opinions. And that's completely fine. Then there are people who see something they believe has potential and actually want to see what it can become. They step up. They talk about it. They create attention. They try to build.
2/ Especially with CTOs. A lot of the time, there isn't some traditional “dev” behind the project anymore. Someone sees a narrative. They see potential. They believe the coin could be much bigger than it currently is. So they step up and try to give it life. That's a CTO.
3/ Some KOLs will take over multiple coins. Some will jump from narrative to narrative. Some will trade in and out. Some will stay with one coin and try to build it as far as they possibly can. That's just different styles of trading. Not everyone in crypto operates the same way.
1/ A coin falling does not automatically make it a rug. A KOL posting a CA and giving their opinion on a coin does not automatically make them a farmer. And someone taking over a coin because they see potential does not mean they owe everyone a successful chart. There’s a lot more nuance to this.
2/ Especially with CTOs. A lot of the time, there isn't some traditional “dev” behind the project anymore. Someone sees a narrative. They see potential. They believe the coin could be much bigger than it currently is. So they step up and try to give it life. That's a CTO.
Crypto Twitter has a weird problem. Everyone wants to be the first person to call a coin a rug when it falls… but almost nobody wants to be the person helping it succeed while it’s still alive. And I see this over and over again. 🧵
1/ A coin falling does not automatically make it a rug. A KOL posting a CA and giving their opinion on a coin does not automatically make them a farmer. And someone taking over a coin because they see potential does not mean they owe everyone a successful chart. There’s a lot more nuance to this.
Crypto Twitter has a weird problem. Everyone wants to be the first person to call a coin a rug when it falls… but almost nobody wants to be the person helping it succeed while it’s still alive. And I see this over and over again. 🧵
@Humanevolvd A lot of farms that I’ve witnessed bro
@Nelhck @Humanevolvd Bro, just because a coin ends does not make it a farm or a rug. You’re just a sheep.
@QuantShifter sent you 0.3 lfgggg