WALPHAWHERE ALPHA?
Posts, call results and on-chain activity for this token.
Market change after the first call.
0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 has already delivered a 1x return since its first day of posting on X, and the project is gradually shifting from its early literary narrative based on Vitalik’s Snowmoon toward a privacy application narrative supported by a rea
$ZC From the Snowmoon Literary Narrative to a Repricing of the Ethereum Privacy Ecosystem 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 ZC rebounded from a previous market cap low of around $5M, climbing back above $25M and briefly touching nearly $30M. A rally of almost 5x is clearly more than a simple technical recovery. I believe the most important change behind this rally is that the market is shifting how it values ZC. Initially, the market was buying into the narrative surrounding Vitalik’s Snowmoon novel and the connection between Zipcoin in the story and the real-world ZC token. Now, however, the market is beginning to focus on the privacy payment products Zipcoin is building and whether it has the potential to become a connecting layer within the Ethereum privacy ecosystem. The core of this rally is not the emergence of an entirely new narrative, but the fact that the original narrative is now gaining support from product development and external attention. So we need to ask one question: What has actually changed during this rally? I believe there are three developments worth paying attention to. First, the product has gradually evolved from a literary concept into a set of usable privacy tools. Zipcoin’s original product idea was to turn the concepts in Snowmoon—private money, anonymous payments, and publishing messages by burning tokens—into on-chain functionality. Today, it is no longer just a simple conceptual demonstration. Users can deposit and withdraw assets through Privacy Pools, send private assets to zkmoney accounts, publish messages that remain permanently on-chain through Burn to Speak, and send messages to specific addresses or ENS names through Doorstep, with an economic cost attached. More importantly, Zipcoin is attempting to connect private assets on Ethereum with Aztec’s private balance system. This expands its product direction beyond simple anonymous transfers into private payments, message publishing, and private fund transfers. Second, external attention is beginning to emerge. Previously, zkmoney publicly mentioned Zipcoin’s use cases, including using Zipcoin to privately fund zkmoney accounts. Later, Trent Van Epps, who has been involved in work related to the Ethereum Foundation, publicly asked how to contact the team. These developments should not be overinterpreted. A mention from zkmoney does not constitute an official e…
Discovered a wallet address that bought $325.1K worth of $ZC, acquiring a total of 23.9M tokens. It has already sold for a profit of $142.5K, with the remaining position worth $409.1K, showing an unrealized profit of +$221.9K. More info: Win Rate: 35.71% Total PnL: +$248.1K (+46.91%) Bal: 67.18 ETH ($181.8K) Wallet address:
Adding $ZC to my bag i’ve been watching it for a while “zipcoin” was mentioned in Vitalik’s book. “ Zip in, unzip anywhere, burn zipcoins to make a message worth readin” Original meme chain base on ETH, so that i’m in CA: 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 Chart: ht
0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 42.12m - 9.5x off from bottom I told you before, i did DCA’d too ZC was in the book of Vitalik. And Etherum is one of biggest chain than ever !!! Time to send OG !!! CA: 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 Chart:
what happens when etherium acquires/endorses/integrates 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 ? Billions
There’s a reason we chose to launch 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 on @Stockereum . Their pools and infrastructure went above and beyond what was available on the market, and from day one, their team understood what we were building and continued to support Z
Looking to get in contact with the @zipcoincash team (not security related)
There’s a reason we chose to launch 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 on @Stockereum . Their pools and infrastructure went above and beyond what was available on the market, and from day one, their team understood what we were building and continued to support Zipcoin as the project grew. Today, we’re announcing the next phase of that collaboration. The team behind Zipcoin is expanding, with new public-facing advisors joining over the coming weeks. This weekend, we’ll also release a detailed roadmap outlining what we’re building next and our vision for the future of the protocol. As part of our ongoing discussions with Stockereum, we’ve been looking at where their continued support can have the greatest long-term impact. Together, we agreed that the 10% of protocol fees previously earmarked for ZC buybacks will create significantly more value for holders by being invested directly into the growth of Zipcoin, helping fund development, grow the ecosystem, support privacy initiatives and accelerate our mission. Long-term alignment. Long-term building. Privacy is not a feature. It is a freedom. Return to mainnet.
$ZC 13.88m dyor 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 okx wallet: After Vitalik wrote the sci-fi novel Snowmoon, in which countries use zipcoin for payments, anonymous transactions, burning coins to gain speaking rights, and transaction taxes flowin
0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 has already delivered a 1x return since its first day of posting on X, and the project is gradually shifting from its early literary narrative based on Vitalik’s Snowmoon toward a privacy application narrative supported by a real product and external attention. 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 It is not Vitalik’s token, and Vitalik has not endorsed it. The project’s core idea is to turn the privacy payments and burn-to-send-message concepts of Zipcoin in Snowmoon into an actual product on Ethereum. In terms of its product, ZC has already built several core features: Zip / Unzip: Users deposit ZC into a Privacy Pool and then withdraw it to a new wallet using a zero-knowledge proof, reducing the direct link between the depositing and withdrawing addresses. Burn to Speak: Users burn ZC to publish on-chain messages. The amount of ZC burned affects the message’s ranking. Doorstep: Users send messages to ENS names or wallet addresses by burning ZC to get the recipient’s attention. They can also attach private transfers. ZipTeller: Connects private funds with zkmoney and supports private fund operations for zkmoney accounts. These features mean ZC is no longer just a Meme borrowing a literary concept. It is a literary narrative token backed by an actual product. However, having a working product does not mean its privacy capabilities are mature, nor does it mean the market has developed real demand. The most important recent development is the emergence of external attention. zkmoney has publicly mentioned Zipcoin and discussed using Zipcoin to fund zkmoney accounts privately. Meanwhile, the team has expanded the fund flow to the 0xbow ETH Privacy Pool, attempting to use a larger ETH privacy pool and then convert the funds into private DAI on zkmoney. This means ZC is extending from an independent privacy application toward an entry point that connects with existing privacy infrastructure. Compared with demonstrations published by the team itself, attention and integration initiated by external products carry greater validation value. However, external mentions and actual adoption are two different things. Although the number of deposits in the Privacy Pool has increased from around 9 to around 19, and wallets outside the team have begun using Burn to Speak, the overall scale remains small. External tra…
added zipcoin @ 4.7, added stockereum @ 2.7 I don't think this is a hard bet to take, not hard at all actually the competitor has nothing to give, while the runner of eth 2026-2027 has been chosen only thing you need to do is have balls
ended up with way more 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 supply than I expected but man I'm happy with my buys scaled to avg. buy of ~ 5.1M I think zipcoin can trade ~ 30m eow and stockereum to follow very rare to see runner > launchpad anyways, especially when launchpad has delivered from day 0 perfectly
Trust in @VitalikButerin chad vision 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722
In one sentence $Stocker is $ZC launchpad + liquidity layer + tax pipeline ZC uses that pipeline to implement additional mechanisms such as privacy, burn-to-speak, and burn-to-enter The two are essentially a “launch platform” and a “functional token launched on that platform”, rather than being part of the same protocol
Discovered a wallet address that bought $501.87 worth of $ZC, acquiring a total of 4M tokens. It has already sold for a profit of $5.78K, with the remaining position worth $27.4K, showing an unrealized profit of +$32.58K. More info: Win Rate: 100% Total PnL: +$34.1K (+1790.43%) Bal: 2.29 ETH ($6.12K) Wallet address:
$ZC 13.88m dyor 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 okx wallet: After Vitalik wrote the sci-fi novel Snowmoon, in which countries use zipcoin for payments, anonymous transactions, burning coins to gain speaking rights, and transaction taxes flowing directly into the treasury in real time, this dev turned the currency from the book into an onchain token and connected it to Privacy Pools. Users can deposit ZC into the pool, called zip, then use a zero-knowledge proof generated in the browser to withdraw it to any new address, called unzip. There is also another mechanism: users can burn ZC to publish an onchain message. The more they burn, the louder their voice becomes. They can also anonymously send messages using already-zipped funds. The project appears to be trying to do two things at the same time: provide verifiable private transfers, and create a public forum where you have to pay to speak. Deposits have to pass an association-set review, and unapproved deposits can be returned to the depositor. The entire product runs on Ethereum mainnet, with no accounts and no custody. The server never holds users’ private keys. The total supply is fixed at 1 billion, and the token launched on Stockereum. Liquidity is held in a Uniswap v4 position controlled by the launch Hook. The contract has no mint function and no owner. Every swap on Stockereum charges a 1% fee. 0.5% goes to the zipcoin treasury in ETH, referred to as the Veridian sales tax. Zip also charges a 0.5% ZC review fee, while anonymous unzips and message publishing through the relayer charge 1% ZC. The ZC token is both the fuel and the ticket. Transfers, anonymous withdrawals, and publishing messages all require ZC. And once ZC is burned, it disappears from the supply.
Adding $ZC to my bag i’ve been watching it for a while “zipcoin” was mentioned in Vitalik’s book. “ Zip in, unzip anywhere, burn zipcoins to make a message worth readin” Original meme chain base on ETH, so that i’m in CA: 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 Chart:
$ZC 0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 ^^^^^^^^ LAUNCHED ON $STOCKER 0x75e2fc69ff2ac12af65ba7d321bbf4f878c535d2 HELLOOOO??? Why the fuck launchpad token is 70% lower than the main runner?
Evidence timeline
X and Telegram posts, app-native calls and on-chain activity linked to this asset.
$STOCKER 9m dyor 0x75e2fc69ff2ac12af65ba7d321bbf4f878c535d2 okx wallet: Stockereum is a launchpad that combines Meme coins with real stocks when launching tokens. You can launch a Meme coin with one click, similar to Pump, but instead of only pairing it
$STOCKER, the launchpad behind $ZC, is worth keeping an eye on. It has already demonstrated strong fundamentals, and the platform is trying to turn a relatively straightforward token economic mechanism into a self-sustaining trading and burn flywheel. 0x75e2fc69ff2ac12af65ba7d321bbf4f878c535d2 According to the data on its official website, Stockerum is no longer just a conceptual showcase. The platform has recorded approximately $99.83M in cumulative trading volume, generated around $558.01K in rewards, processed 267K trades, and launched 1,688 tokens. These figures at least indicate that the platform has real trading activity and a certain level of product adoption. What deserves even more attention is its fee distribution mechanism. Of the platform fees generated by each ETH trading pair, 60% is used to buy back and burn the corresponding token, while 10% goes to the Zcoin Foundation. Different tokens also have their own fee allocation ratios. According to the official website, STOCKER currently receives a 50% allocation, while ZC, VERIDIA, and SC receive 10%, 5%, and 5%, respectively. This means STOCKER is not relying solely on market sentiment to attract attention. As long as the platform continues to generate trading activity, STOCKER has the opportunity to benefit from ongoing buybacks and burns through this fee distribution mechanism. According to the official website, approximately 38.69 million STOCKER tokens have been burned so far, with a corresponding value of around $251.56K. A total of 477 burns have been executed, using approximately 30.065 ETH. Of course, a burn mechanism should not be directly equated with price appreciation. Burning reduces the circulating supply, but whether it can ultimately support the valuation still depends on new buying demand, platform trading volume, and the sustainability of fee revenue. If platform activity cools down, the burn rate may slow as well. Moreover, the platform's total trading volume does not translate entirely into actual buying pressure for STOCKER. Its fee allocation ratio and the execution of buybacks also need to be monitored and verified over time. Another development that cannot be overlooked is that Stockereum is not positioning itself as just another ordinary Meme launchpad. Instead, it pairs newly launched tokens with tokenized stocks, bringing familiar symbols from traditional financial mar…